DIRECT TAX-GDP RATIO
ANOVA: Single factor SUMMARY Groups Count Sum Average P1 11 21.7 1.972727 P2 11 30.5 2.772727 P3 11 56.11 5.100909
ANOVA Source of variation SS df MS Between groups 58.10182 2 29.05091 Within groups 10.47533 30 0.349178 Total 68.57715 32
ANOVA: Single factor SUMMARY Groups Variance P1 0.006342 P2 0.098182 P3 0.943009
ANOVA Source of variation F P-value F crit Between groups 83.1981 5.75E-13 3.31583 Within groups Total TABLE 1(b).
* The analysis of variance (
ANOVA) was used as a test of means for two or more populations.
Table 1 shows the summary of One way
ANOVA for COD.
Key words: One-way
ANOVA Outlier Non-normality Homogeneity of variance Type-I error.
Among his topics are comparing the simplest model and a regression model, the traditional one-way
ANOVA (analysis of variable) approach, multiple regression: when predictors interact, two-by-three
ANOVA: complex categorical models, and analysis of covariance: continuous and categorical predictors.
More importantly, the
ANOVA test is a powerful procedure to evaluate if three or more statistical normal samples are drawn from one or more populations (e.g., Jensen et al., 1997; Bevington and Robinson, 2003; Miller and Miller, 2005; Verma, 2005).
At boys the analyses of One Way
ANOVA Independent groups (tab.
Major Finding: Observer evaluation of walking ability was strongly associated with the timed walk (
ANOVA r2 = 0.58; P less than .001) and "get up and go" tests (
ANOVA r2= 0.56; P less than .001) and less strongly associated with patient self-reports (SF-36;
ANOVA r2 = 0.23; P less than .001 and Lequesne
ANOVA r2 = 0.27; P less than .001).
The
ANOVAs for the PM 1 plate showed that there were no interactions between effects of isolates vs effects of carbon sources, again for both, biofilm production (P-value=0.9704) and growth (P=1.0).
I can't wait for people to see how incredible the
ANOVA is.”
O menor valor foi obtido pelo metodo da
ANOVA no experimento 1 e o maior pelo CP(cov) no Experimento 4.
lineatus had lower energy levels (
ANOVA, [F.sub.4,99] = 39.18, p < 0.01) than the other species (Tukey, p < 0.001) and lower protein levels (
ANOVA, [F.sub.4,99] = 90.47, p > 0.01) in comparison with P.